Paris, 06 janvier 2012 - Visualiser l'eAlerte
On November 30, 2011, Japan enacted the 5% corporate tax rate reduction and related tax-basis broadening provisions including the limitation on net operating loss ("NOL") utilization. Japan also enacted a new temporary 2.5% surtax to raise revenue for the March earthquake's reconstruction effort. This will result in approximately a 2% net reduction in the corporate tax rate for three years starting in April, 2012 and a 5% reduction thereafter.
Japan's corporate tax consists of three parts; a national tax, an inhabitant tax, and a local enterprise tax. Under the new law, the national corporate tax rate will decrease from 30% to 25.5% for tax years beginning on or after April 1, 2012, thereby reducing the effective tax rate from 40.69% to 35.64% for large corporations. This does not consider the temporary surtax which is discussed below. The United States now will have the highest effective tax rate among Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development ("OECD") countries.
In addition to the corporate tax rate reduction, a temporary corporate tax rate increase, known as the "Restoration Surtax," is introduced to support the country's reconstruction effort for damages caused by the March earthquake. The temporary tax increases are effective for fiscal years beginning on or after April 1, 2012 and on or before April 1, 2014. In alignment with the corporate tax rate reduction, the restoration surtax amounts to approximately 2.55% in the computation of the overall Japanese effective corporate tax rate.
In aggregate, the effective corporate tax rate will be 38.01% for large corporations for the years beginning on or after April 1, 2012. Following tax years beginning on or after April 1, 2015 and the expiration of the restoration surtax, the corporate effective tax rate will be further reduced to 35.64%.
To offset expected revenue loss from the corporate tax rate reduction, the new legislation includes tax base-broadening provisions. The most significant of all is the limitation on NOL utilization. Effective with fiscal years starting on or after April 1, 2012, a company's NOL utilization will be limited to 80% of current taxable income, versus 100% under the current rules. The new law will also extend the current NOL carry forward period from seven to nine years and applies to NOLs incurred during fiscal years ending on or after April 1, 2008.
Other tax base-broadening provisions include the slower recovery of depreciation, deferral of the bad debt allowance, abolishment of extraordinary repairs reserves, and reduction of donation expense deductibility.
For financial reporting purposes, companies are required to account for income taxes based on the tax laws as enacted (US Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, US "GAAP") or substantively enacted (International Financial Reporting Standards, "IFRS") at the balance sheet date. This legislation is considered enacted and substantively enacted on November 30, 2011, the date the legislation was passed by the Japanese Diet. Therefore, any impact of the changes in tax law should be recorded in the financial reporting period including November 30, 2011.
As noted above, the corporate tax provisions are generally effective for tax years beginning on or after April 1, 2012. The overall corporate tax rate will reduce when the new rate and the surtax initially become effective, and then again three years later when the surtax expires. For financial reporting purposes, the annual effective rate should be revised to take into account the impact of the rate changes in the interim period that includes November 30, 2011. Companies must also consider the impact of the tax rate changes on existing deferred tax balances and record the impact as a discrete item in the interim period that includes November 30, 2011. The effect of the tax rate changes, particularly with the changes taking place in Japan over the ensuing years, may require a detailed scheduling analysis to determine when existing temporary differences are expected to reverse.
In addition to the tax rate changes, the new NOL limitation rule discussed above may prompt companies to reassess the realizability of deferred tax assets, particularly those representing the tax effects of NOL carryovers. This may affect the existence or the amount of valuation allowances for US GAAP purposes or the amount of net deferred tax assets reported under IFRS.
Under US GAAP, the effects, both current and deferred, should be reported as part of the tax provision attributable to continuing operations. Under IFRS, companies should backwards trace the effects of the law changes on existing deferred tax balances in order to determine the portion of the adjustment that should be recognized as part of the tax provision attributable to continuing operations or otherwise recognized as part of the tax provision allocable to other comprehensive income or equity.
Given the scheduled corporate tax rate reduction, companies may wish to consider changing a tax year to accelerate the effective date of the rate reduction. For a company with a December 31 tax year end, the effective date of the lower rate is January 1, 2013. This company could change its tax year to March 31 before April 1, 2012 in order to immediately realize the benefit of a lower tax rate upon enactment of the lower rate on April 1, 2012.
However, given that the net rate reduction will be approximately 2%, the incentive to accelerate the effective date might not be strong. Instead, if a company has significant NOLs, it might want to defer the effective date and postpone the application of the NOL limitation rule. If a company with a March 31 tax year end expects to generate a considerable amount of income in late 2012 and cannot accelerate that income in order to get full utilization of its NOL before the NOL limitation rule takes effect on April 1, 2012, the company could change its tax year end to February 28, which would provide an additional 11 months to offset such income with available NOLs without limitation.